No. Just no. For many reasons. Don’t be part of the problem. “You would think…” stop there. You don’t need to use conjecture when there is research at your fingertips. Signed - worked in bacterial and viral genetics and vaccine development for decades.
I doubt asking questions is being part of the problem. Making claims of authority/expert on the topic, while no providing no additional however…
Have you considered providing credible sources instead?
Might be easier for you to discern them compared to the rest of us and would be much appreciated.
No. Just no. For many reasons. Don’t be part of the problem. “You would think…” stop there. You don’t need to use conjecture when there is research at your fingertips. Signed - worked in bacterial and viral genetics and vaccine development for decades.
I doubt asking questions is being part of the problem. Making claims of authority/expert on the topic, while no providing no additional however…
Have you considered providing credible sources instead? Might be easier for you to discern them compared to the rest of us and would be much appreciated.
so what’s wrong with what they said?
Well, let’s imagine that vaccine antibodies do actually stick around longer for a moment. All right. Who cares?
I could certainly think it was interesting. But concerning? In what way? “Oh no, I accidentally have too much money.” Okay. And?
This is essentially an appeal to nature fallacy. We don’t need to imagine she has a point to make; she’s trying to scare people.
there is no fallacy being committed at all in this thread. and you haven’t explained why this is the case anyway, you’ve only hinted at a hypothesis.
Oh, you’re an anti-vaxxer, huh.
Well, I could say I tried, I guess.
you’ve made a leap of logic. but if that’s what you call trying, maybe we should wait for a real scientist