Ok then I’m sorry I completely misunderstood you

Its hard to be morally consistent. But not impossible.

Yeah but a person having multiple partners of different genders isnt different to a person having multiple of the same gender and neither are really a bad thing. So i am missing your point or you’re chirping the classic “bi people are whores” meme.

You’re the exact person being referenced throughout this thread.

Everymans straight until they meet a cute twink

I’ve seen so many cases of staunch progressive groups weaponize a guys sexuality as soon as they have a falling out with him. Its like these people never believed what they were saying. People are so spineless and have no morals.

I dont care if they are a 1 person business or a small team. What im talking about is when a Giant multinational corporation buys up 1000s of youtube channels. I want to watch 1 person or a small team not a big talent corp

Most youtubers are businesses owned by corporate networks. The person on screen is just the talent pretending to be an organic channel.

I only know this because im a really shit gardener

If you’re on a raspberry pi or mobile then its probably best to filter that traffic because my website is dogshit on mobile. I flat out do not understand CSS

Yes but im spite driven. I’ll take the extra hit to inflict damage to the crawlers

Shit you see in an old text book at 3am

Thanks for the answer, it was very helpful and thnaks to everyone else you answered in this thread.

If you set your router to only forward traffic from port 443 to a certain host does this drop all non port 443 traffic to that host?

Would putting everything behind anubis mitigate that?

Ah hes a degrowther, makes sense. I read through his paper and I really don’t think its realistic or thought provoking. It lacks humanity and applies a utilitarian solution. Its the same as saying we have x humans producing co2 lets reduce the number of humans but instead of humans its goods he deems to be unnecessary.

His entire premise is based on what he thinks a person needs to live a good life. But lifes just not that simple and people all around the world NEED different things this type of strict partitioning fails when applied to the entire world. Part of what makes our current system work is that its dynamic, people create goods they want and those who also want those goods buy them.

How did they calculate that? I don’t believe it.