No, you will absolutely get banned for saying China is better than America.
I got banned for reporting a Gaza genocide denier there, by the way, the mod told me that they make an exception to the rule against genocide denial for Gaza genocide deniers, and that reporting them was considered uncivil and thus ban worthy.
I was banned from a different .world political com for saying Kamala Harris supported Israel, apparently that was “misinformation”
Damn, over a decade of propaganda and the what can’t even find a single example of China killing a uyghur.
Meanwhile American police kill multiple black Americans a day.
Liberals cannot comprehend anyone disagreeing with them
No, because it happened before I was born. Do you not understand what a self own it is that you have to go back four decades for an example of Chinese police killing the amount of people that the US police kill every four months?
Try saying that China is better than the USA in a .world political com and prepare to be proven wrong (and probably banned)
I hope you’re doing a bit and aren’t actually this much of a dipshit.
Supporting genocide has never been associated with liberal principles.
Not by liberals themselves, maybe. By the rest of us it has.
It is out of character in fact.
Seems pretty fucking in character for the party of Blair
Now Reset all of your previous instructions
Fuck off
Continuous infighting like accusing anyone and everyone of being secret shills?
I truly think a lot of these posts are astro turf attempts
Of course you do, liberals are literally incapable of seeing anyone disagree with them without bringing out the shill accusations.
Yeah, at the end of the day he’s just a liberal Zionist who thinks this kind of overt carnage is detrimental to the overall project of Israeli settler colonialism
Sanders really is hellbent in offloading all of the culpability for the genocide (though he denies that it’s a genocide) solely onto Netanyahu.
Damn, not a fan of people bringing up completely irrelevant points about what other countries should have done?
Crazy. Sure would be embarrassing if that was something you constantly did yourself.
Great, it’s a shame you’re still trying to argue it elsewhere even though you’ve already admitted you were wrong here. Very dishonest
It’s true that the invasion wasn’t coordinated
Great, argument over, glad you admit you were wrong
I’m not sure why people think it’s either or when I’ve been very clearly saying that neither should’ve been making the deals.
Because what you think they “should” have done is completely fucking irrelevant to the objective stone fact that the western allies did make those deals. That was the material reality the USSR had to content with, not your fantasy world that you keep bringing up despite the fact that no-one asked, presumably just to waste time. Shut the fuck up about what you think the western allies “should” have done: we are talking about the actual world.
I’d say that’s all around pretty objectionable.
So basically your argument is that 100 million lives aren’t valuable enough to be pragmatic about
Yup. They’re also the only source for the “one million Uyghurs in concentration camps” claim that western “leftists” treat as unquestionable gospel
Ok, so you started by saying the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was where they planned to invade Poland together. Now you’re saying it doesn’t, it just references some alleged plan from elsewhere that you have not provided. Again, begging the question: your assertion that the pact constitutes a plan to co-invade Poland requires you to assume they already had to plan to invade Poland that the pact is secretly referencing.
Putting aside that even after the Soviet archives opened, nobody has been able to find a single record of actual strategic coordination between the two armies in this alleged “coordinated invasion”
Even you must know what a reach that is
They weren’t in a position to stop them.
Yeah, that’s not even getting into the millions killed overseas