RaivoKulli

11

Say you’re a girl when you aren’t a girl in order to fool the other person into thinking that you’re a girl

For me it was Habbo Hotel. I’m hearing this sort of shit is rampant on Roblox. It’s nice to know kids are keeping some traditions alive.

TORILLE 🇫🇮🇫🇮🇫🇮

no wait

It’s such a stupid and nonsensical insult that I just love it

You could make the simplest of jokes and someone still wouldn’t get it. Lemmy is excellent at not getting jokes

Digital Rectal Management

Bum finger as the Brits call it

Me when doing field work

Meanwhile, your country was literally in the Axis in WW2, and helped the nazis carry out their atrocities.

Am I personally guilty of what happened in my country’s the past or how is that relevant?

Not sure if we are supposed to agree with everything our countries have historically done. Are you from a place where you’re comfortable with doing that?

I mean they did make those deals, Soviet Union made the deals, I think it was all shit.

So basically your argument is that 100 million lives aren’t valuable enough to be pragmatic about

Pragmatism from all sides when dealing with Nazis is what caused the situation to get that far tbqh

About that part for sure

It’s true that the invasion wasn’t coordinated more than Germans informing of their invasion and Soviets making their own plans for their invasion. So joint invasion after USSR joined it, but not coordinated.

The German invasion began on 1 September 1939, one week after the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union, and one day after the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union had approved the pact.

I wonder what you think the pact is talking about if not the invasion that happened right after.

We don’t know how it would’ve played out if both Western Allies and the USSR committed publicly to declaring war in case Poland is attacked.

I’m saying they could’ve threatened to. USSR, France, UK all declaring war at the same time because of the invasion would’ve been a better deterrent than just France and UK, especially since it would be war on both sides.

As for Katyn, it’s more intentional mistranslation, there was admittance of prisoner transport. None of this explains why the execution method was the exact same as the Nazis, in Nazi territory, with Nazi bullets manufactured during 1941.

http://archive.government.ru/eng/docs/10122/print/

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-04-14-mn-972-story.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/26/russian-parliament-guilt-katyn-massacre

It’s been admitted to many times. It’s no error.

I mean clearly not. They could’ve continued on from Poland, but went to West first and then to South. Without Molotov-Ribbentrop, not sure if that would’ve been different other than Hitler being (even) less confident about the non-aggression between them. But it’s what ifs.

You don’t have to have formal pact or alliance in place to pledge to declare war in case of another country is invaded. You don’t have to have an agreement in place to share intelligence to them, such as the secret protocols or about the negotiations, etc etc. They could’ve done more.

Goebbels even tried to blame one such massacre on the Red Army, Katyn, despite the spent ammunition clearly being marked as produced by Nazi Germany in 1941.

Oof. Soviet Union already admitted to Katyn massacre. Time to let this conspiracy theory go.

They let Nazi Germany have parts of Poland and Lithuania in the agreement.

I’m not sure why people think it’s either or when I’ve been very clearly saying that neither should’ve been making the deals. West made deals that damn them, but stopped at Poland. Soviet Union was put in a shitty position but also they agreed to carve up Poland alongside Nazi Germany. I’d say that’s all around pretty objectionable.