• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 29th, 2025

help-circle

  • your sexual orientation is not compatible, then it’s fine rejecting them but not disliking or being repulsed by them.”

    I mean, I’m referring to sexual repulsion. This is typically what people are referring to when they talk about having a preference against some person or other. It manifests as a visceral negative reaction, very similar to what one might feel if they think about eating something they find gross. A gay man would find the idea of sleeping with a woman repulsive. He can still treat women with respect. In the same way, a woman can find the idea of sleeping with a bi guy repulsive, and can still treat bi men with respect. This is an incompatibility in sexual orientation.

    Same guy, same level of physical attractiveness, just as good a person, but straight : desirable. Exact same person but bisexual man : repulsive and less than a real man

    I could just as easily swap in what kind of shoes the guy wears, the guy’s political affiliation, the accent the guy has, the way he has chosen to style his hair, or literally anything else.

    But I am curious, do some groups of people give you a “visceral feeling of disgust” like mint chocolate gives you ? What groups of people would those be ?

    Certainly. I’m straight. The idea of sleeping with another man gives me a visceral feeling of disgust. This is fine. I am completely comfortable admitting this, because this is my sexual preference.

    Or are you saying it’s ok or normal being viscerally repulsed by poor or shy people?

    It is 100% okay to feel whatever feelings one feels. If the thought of sleeping with someone who is poor or shy is repulsive to you, then that is fine. You don’t have to sleep with them.

    and frankly I don’t even know why you brought up physics in a story about social issues

    Because I don’t think you know what the word “objective” means.

    The Aztecs thought it was right to sacrifice children to the gods by cutting their hearts out. We don’t. Moral relativism says that both of these points of view are equally valid in their respective cultures. I happen to think that this is more or less the correct point of view, since any kind of objective morality is literally impossible because all morality is is values, and values are pure subjectivity. But that’s an academic distinction.

    My point fits squarely within good ol’ fashioned liberal western ethics, which you identified as “does no harm to anyone”.

    Being sexually repulsed by bisexual men, and expressing this preference by simply not sleeping with them harms no one.


  • But being repulsed by all black people, or gingers, or Asians, for the sole reason they are black, or ginger, or Asian, is not.

    So gay men should suck it up and give women a chance?

    If the only reason you dislike or are repulsed by a group of people is irrational

    Most of attraction/unattraction is not rational. It is emotional. It is a visceral feeling that doesn’t care about logic.

    I, personally, don’t like mint chocolate. When I put it in my mouth, I feel a visceral feeling of disgust, and spit it out. There is no logic behind this - it is just what I like and don’t like.

    not a visual or physical trait.

    I also provided examples of being turned off by people who are shy, dumb, or poor. Again, these are not logical reasonings, but visceral responses to an individual and their traits.

    Nobody’s demonizing anybody

    You’re demonizing all women who like straight guys but are turned off by bi guys by calling them biphobic.

    some things are in fact objectively wrong.

    Objectivity is when something is true with no observer present. Morality requires an observer to decree what is right and wrong. This is why we have many philosophical schools of ethics, but only one school of physics (except at the very edge of research).






  • Honestly, while the exact way your ex handled the situation probably wasn’t ideal, this notion is really just an extension of the sexual puritanism that created homophobia in the first place. Imo, we should just accept that people’s sexual desires are what they are. If someone is turned off by bi guys, that’s fine - she doesn’t have to date them. Just like it is perfectly fine to be turned off by people with red hair, or people with annoying laughs, or people who are skinnier or fatter than whatever your personal preference is. Some people aren’t interested in shy people. Some people aren’t interested in dumb people. Some people aren’t interested in poor people. Does it suck when someone you like isn’t interested in you because of something you can’t control? Yes! But at the same time, people’s sexual preferences are also largely outside their control. So why demonize them for them?





  • > be me
    > go home because parents guilted me into it
    > first step out the airport. It’s 1000000° and the air is sticky asf
    > IveMadeAHugeMistake.jpg
    > house is a wreck. random bullshit piled to the ceiling in spare rooms just like when I was a kid
    > mom bitching about brown people. same bitching I’ve heard all my life
    > dad talking about how he’s gonna retire soon. yeah right. what would he do with his time if he wasnt working?
    > feel melancholy and hopelessness setting in
    > tfw you realize you have to live like this for 2 more days until your flight