• CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    To be fair even our attempts at describing a technically possible but implausably simple version of a blackhole are essentially educated speculation. Although worth noting that black hole like objects did appear in fiction before they were discovered IRL.

    Edit: To clarify our current models tend to involve non-rotating and un-charged black holes and even then there’s significant conjecture as to what happens beyond the event horizon.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      What do you mean? We understand them well enough that we can predict the gravitational waves of a black hole merger.

      • AEsheron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        IIRC, the biggest uncertainty is about the singularity. I don’t know if it’s still true, but my understanding was that the consensus is that it isn’t really a true point of infinitely dense mass. That is how our current models say it must be, but many assumed our current models are incomplete and that more accurate ones will show that it must have some volume. And given the extreme nature of them, any updates to our models might have some significant repercussions in other aspects of them too.

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          So far, we haven’t seen a physical infinity in any part of the universe, so if our models produce a point of infinite anything, they’re probably wrong.